Glossary of Natural Hazards Guidance Note Terminology
General
A term used to describe the frequency or probability of floods occurring. Large floods occur rarely, whereas small floods occur more frequently. For example, a 1% AEP flood occurs (or is exceeded) on average once every 100 years. A so-called 100-year flood does not mean that there is only one flood of this size every 100 years. It means that there is a 1 in 100 chance in any given year that a flood of this size or bigger will happen; it is therefore more correctly called a 1% AEP flood. In any given year, there is about a 65 percent chance that there will be at least one 1% AEP flood in populated catchments of New Zealand (NIWA 2007). |
|
A translational slide in which the moving mass consists of a single unit or a few closely related units that move downslope as a single unit (Wold, 1989). |
|
A very rapid to extremely rapid landslide on a steep slope which is unconfined to a channel. Debris avalanches often initiate debris flows. |
|
Debris flow |
A form of rapid mass movement in which soils, rocks, and organic matter combine with entrained air and water to form a slurry that then flows down a slope in a confined channel. Debris flows are associated with steep confined gullies (Wold, 1989). |
Earth flow |
A bowl or depression forming at a head where unstable material collects and flows out. The central area is narrow and usually becomes wider as it reaches the valley floor. Flows generally occur in fine-grained materials or clay-bearing rocks on moderate slopes and with saturated dry conditions. Dry flows of granular material are also possible. Earth flows have a characteristic 'hour glass ' shape (Wold, 1989). |
The landscape of all hazards in a particular place or the net result of natural and man-made hazards and the risks they pose cumulatively across a given area. |
|
Lateral spreads |
The result of the nearly horizontal movement of geologic materials, distinctive because they usually occur on very gentle slopes. The movement is caused by liquefaction triggered by rapid ground motion, such as that experienced during an earthquake (Wold, 1989). |
Liquefaction |
A process that causes some soils to lose their strength and behave more like a liquid than a solid during an earthquake. |
Mitigation involves taking steps to reduce the likelihood of a natural hazard occurring or the consequence of its impact.
|
|
RMA 1991 definition of natural hazard ?Natural hazard means any atmospheric or earth or water related occurrence (including earthquake, tsunami, erosion, volcanic and geothermal activity, landslip, subsidence, sedimentation, wind, drought, fire, or flooding) the action of which adversely affects or may adversely affect human life, property, or other aspects of the environment. ' CDEM Act 2002 definition of hazard ?Hazard means something that may cause, or contribute substantially to the cause of, an emergency. ' Building Act 2004 definition of natural hazard ?Natural hazard means any of the following:
|
|
The net present value (NPV) method of evaluating a major project allows the changing value of money over time to be considered. Essentially, it helps find the present value in ?today's dollars ' of the future net cash flow (or the value) of a project. It is then possible to compare that amount with the amount of money needed to implement the project. |
|
Overland flow path |
The route taken by stormwater which becomes concentrated as it flows overland, making its way downhill following the path of least resistance towards the stormwater network, streams or the coast. Overland flow paths vary in width depending on the shape of the ground over which they flow, but once the contributing catchment area exceeds 30,000 square metres, they are referred to as major overland flow paths. Overland flow paths include secondary flow paths which result when the piped stormwater system gets blocked or when the capacity is exceeded. Secondary overland flow paths are the backup stormwater system. |
Defined as "the lack of full scientific evidence shall not be used as reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation"(1992 Rio Declaration)/ |
|
In the context of natural hazard management qualitative analysis means using words to describe the magnitude and likelihood of potential consequences arising out of a natural hazard event. |
|
In the context of natural hazard management means using numerical values for both the magnitude and likelihood of natural hazard consequences that may occur. |
|
Developing operational systems and capabilities before an emergency happens. These include self-help and response programmes for the general public, as well as specific programmes for emergency services, utilities, and other agencies. |
|
Activities beginning after initial impact has been stabilised and extending until the community's capacity for self-help has been restored. |
|
Identifying and analysing long-term risks to human life and property from natural or man-made hazards; taking steps to eliminate these risks where practicable and, where not, reducing the likelihood and the magnitude of their impact. |
|
Actions taken immediately before, during or directly after an emergency, to save lives and property, as well as to help communities recover. |
|
Rockfall |
One or more pieces of rock falling from a steep rocky slope whether one at a time or all at once. |
Rotational landslide |
A landslide in which the surface of the rupture is curved concavely upward (spoon shaped) and the slide movement is more or less rotational about an axis parallel to the contour of the slope (Wold, 1989). |
Acronym for Seriousness, Manageability, Urgency, Growth where: |
|
Topple |
A block of rock that tilts or rotates forward, eventually to fall, bounce, or roll down the slope as a rockfall (Spiker & Gori, 2003). Often also used for the whole event, including the rockfall deposit. |
Transitional slide |
A landslide in which the mass of soil and rock moves out or down and outward with little rotational movement or backward tilting (Spiker & Gori, 2003). |
Risk management definitions: as per AS/NZS standard 4360
Consequence |
Means the outcome or impact of an event. NOTE 1: There can be more than one consequence from one event. |
Event occurrence |
Means: of a particular set of circumstances. |
Frequency: |
A measure of the number of occurrences per unit of time. |
Hazard: |
A source of potential harm. |
Likelihood: |
Used as a general description of probability or frequency.
|
Monitor: |
To check, supervise, observe critically or measure the progress of an activity, action or system on a regular basis in order to identify change from the performance level required or expected. |
Probability: |
A measure of the chance of occurrence expressed as a number between 0 and 1.
|
Residual risk: |
The risk remaining after implementation of risk treatment |
Risk: |
The chance of something happening that will have an impact on objectives
|
Risk analysis: |
A systematic process to understand the nature of and to deduce the level of risk.
|
Risk assessment: |
The overall process of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation. |
Risk avoidance |
A decision not to become involved in, or to withdraw from, a risk situation. |
Risk evaluation: |
A process of comparing the level of risk against risk criteria.
|
Risk identification: |
The process of determining what, where, when, why and how something could happen. |
Risk management: |
The culture, processes and structures that are directed towards realising potential opportunities whilst managing adverse effects. |
Risk management process: |
The systematic application of management policies, procedures and practices to the tasks of communicating, establishing the context, identifying, analysing, evaluating, treating, monitoring and reviewing risk. |
Risk management framework: |
A set of elements of an organisation 's management system concerned with managing risk.
|
Risk reduction: |
Actions taken to lessen the likelihood, negative consequences, or both, associated with a risk. |
Risk treatment: |
Process of selection and implementation of measures to modify risk
|
Types of analysis
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative analysis uses words to describe the magnitude of potential consequences and the likelihood that those consequences will occur. These descriptions can be adapted or adjusted to suit the circumstances, and different descriptions may be used for different risks. Qualitative analysis may be used:
- as an initial screening activity to identify risks which require more detailed analysis
- where this kind of analysis is appropriate for decisions
- where the numerical data or resources are inadequate for a quantitative analysis.
Qualitative analysis should be informed by factual information and data where available.
Semi-quantitative analysis
In semi-quantitative analysis, qualitative scales such as those described above are given values. The objective is to produce a more expanded ranking scale than is usually achieved in qualitative analysis, not to suggest realistic values for risk such as is attempted in quantitative analysis. However, since the value allocated to each description may not bear an accurate relationship to the actual magnitude of consequences or likelihood, the numbers should only be combined using a formula that recognises the limitations of the kinds of scales used. Care must be taken with the use of semi-quantitative analysis because the numbers chosen may not properly reflect relativities and this can lead to inconsistent, anomalous or inappropriate outcomes. Semi-quantitative analysis may not differentiate properly between risks, particularly when either consequences or likelihood are extreme.
Quantitative analysis
Quantitative analysis uses numerical values (rather than the descriptive scales used in qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis) for both consequences and likelihood using data from a variety of sources. The quality of the analysis depends on the accuracy and completeness of the numerical values and the validity of the models used. Consequences may be determined by modelling the outcomes of an event or set of events, or by extrapolation from experimental studies or past data. Consequences may be expressed in terms of monetary, technical or human impact criteria. In some cases, more than one numerical value is required to specify consequences for different times, places, groups or situations.
The way in which consequences and likelihood are expressed, and the ways in which they are combined to provide a level of risk, will vary according to the type of risk and the purpose for which the risk assessment output is to be used. The uncertainty and variability of both consequences and likelihood should be considered in the analysis and communicated effectively.
The precautionary principle
?where there are threats of serious or irreversible damage, lack of full scientific evidence shall not be used as reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation ' (1992 Rio Declaration)
To be enable it to be used effectively, the precautionary principle needs to be considered within a risk management framework. This ensures that legal and fiscal responsibilities are met, and that decisions are made in a way that incorporates community participation.
Using the precautionary principle within a risk management framework can provide the following benefits:
- a transparent and clear understanding of the risks involved and how taking a precautionary approach can affect a decision
- community buy-in can be documented and inform the risk definitions, particularly where the benefits and costs of a decision can be made known.
- The risk management approach used should be flexible enough to allow the approach to decisions to be flexible enough to incorporate changing or new data on the nature and extent of the hazard, and how this impacts on risk.
