Advance to content | List of Access Keys |

Linkages between key RMA documents

Note that the thickness of the line corresponds to the legal weighting accorded the relationship between documents. In the diagram, the following abbreviations are used.

GE = Must give effect to

NI = Must not be inconsistent with

RP = Recognise and provide for

TA = Take into account

A summary of the relationships (in words) is provided as follows:

Regional plans:

Regional plans must also have regard to:

District plans:

District plans must also have regard to:

Note that those drafting and changing district plans should also consider how national environmental standards impact on plan provisions. For ease of plan administration it would be good practice to incorporate national environmental standards into the plan to the extent necessary under s.43B when the plan is next reviewed or changed.

Recognise and provide for

 'Recognise and provide for ' was held to 'not be an absolute imperative overriding other objectives of the RMA '.
Trio Holding v Marlborough DC (1996) Cited in Salmon Resource Management Act 1991

'Recognise and provide for ' will be used when actual provision is to be made for any matters.
Bleakley v Environmental Risk Management Authority [2001] 3 NZLR 213 (HC)

Give effect to

See the discussion on 'give effect to '.

Have regard to and take into account

The words 'shall have regard to ' indicate that such matters must be given material consideration but not necessarily followed. These words are not synonymous with 'shall take into account '. If the appropriate matters had been to take into account, they must necessarily affect the discretion of the decision maker.
R v Westminster City (1990) and Haddon v Auckland RC (1993) Cited in Salmon Resource Management Act 1991

In Canterbury Regional Council v Waimakariri District Council [2002] C009/02, 7 NZED 210, the Court held that the requirement to 'have regard to ' in the regional policy statement does not require a district plan to actually implement the regional policy statement where the objectives and policies of the regional policy statement are not couched in mandatory language and provide for flexibility within themselves.

In respect of s.8 of the RMA, the case Haddon v Auckland Regional Council [1993] A77/93 noted that the duty was to weigh the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi with all other considerations, effect a balance with all other matters in coming to a decision, and show that this has been done.

A particular matter that a local authority has to 'have regard to ' or 'take into account ' may not necessarily be reflected directly in an RMA plan. However it would be good practice to have documentation that can demonstrate (such as a s.32 report) that it was considered as part of the plan development process (eg, give reasons why the matter was, or was not, included in the RMA plan).